Name: Travellin' Man
E-Mail:
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: For the record...
Date: Sunday, April 30, 2006
Time: 3:16:08 PM
Remote Address: 72.66.185.119
Message ID: 189825
Parent ID: 189822
Thread ID: 189801

RE: RE: RE: RE: For the record...

My thoughts for what they're worth: As I see it, Okie Zep does have a strong tendency towards writing negative posts about the Stones. I cannot recall a positive one yet. One, I remember, suggested the Stones writing great songs like 'Satisfaction', HTW, etc., could have been done by any ol' band, but the Stones were in the right place at the right time. In other words they were there in the beginning. He likened the Stones early writing success to the Oklahoma land rush. Where the fastest riders claimed the best pieces of land.

I think that is pure bullshit and discredits the talents of the songwriting team of Jagger/Richards. This post had nothing to do with the Stones aging, obviously.

Okie Zep likes to stir the pot. Nothing really wrong with that. But I might take his opinions more seriously if, "once in a blue moon", he writes something positive about the band he claims to be his favorite.

• Stones Legacy In Peril? by Oklahoma Zeppelin on 4/30/2006 2:47:48 AM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by Vinney on 4/30/2006 3:17:22 AM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by Undercover on 4/30/2006 3:47:01 AM
• RE: RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by ginsoaked on 4/30/2006 7:01:45 AM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by StoNE on 4/30/2006 5:18:42 AM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by Currie on 4/30/2006 6:02:52 AM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by iFox on 4/30/2006 6:12:54 AM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by 2000 Man on 4/30/2006 7:43:44 AM
• good one 2000 Man by Vinney on 4/30/2006 8:17:41 AM
• For the record... by Oklahoma Zeppelin on 4/30/2006 9:58:05 AM
• RE: Aging Stones by exit from ns on 4/30/2006 10:04:43 AM
• RE: For the record... by StoNE on 4/30/2006 10:43:52 AM
• RE: RE: For the record... by 2000 Man on 4/30/2006 12:35:26 PM
• RE: RE: RE: For the record... by iFox on 4/30/2006 1:13:25 PM
• RE: RE: RE: For the record... by StoNE on 4/30/2006 1:16:50 PM
• RE: RE: RE: RE: For the record... by Travellin' Man on 4/30/2006 3:16:08 PM <-- You Are Here
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by Teiz on 4/30/2006 12:23:51 PM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by JT C on 4/30/2006 1:52:58 PM
• The Stones legacy is indeed in peril! by LonesomeSchoolboy on 4/30/2006 6:46:25 PM
• RE: The Stones legacy is indeed in peril! by manny in ny on 4/30/2006 7:37:56 PM
• RE: The Stones legacy is indeed in peril! by 2000 Man on 4/30/2006 9:29:35 PM
• RE: RE: The Stones legacy is indeed in peril! by LonesomeSchoolboy on 5/1/2006 1:39:01 PM
• RE: Stones Legacy In Peril? by Torn & Frayed on 4/30/2006 9:21:47 PM

Note: Do not hit the "Post Message" button more than once, even if it is taking a long time to post your message. Doing so may cause a double post to appear and could slow down your posting time even more.

Download your free, customizable Burton Networks Message Board now!