Re: Re: Re: Bridges To Babylon-September 30, 1997

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Message board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by keef on September 30, 1999 at 08:26:00:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Bridges To Babylon-September 30, 1997 posted by The Storm on September 30, 1999 at 00:49:45:

Concerning Stones' STUDIO albums:

In my opinion, there are four kinds(levels) of Stones albums: fair, good, great, and masterpiece. I enjoy EVERY Stones album to varying degrees. I don't dislike ANY album. To me, the WORST Stones' album is better than the BEST from just about anybody else out there.

There are only two albums that I would classify in the lowest category(fair). THEIR SATANIC MAJESTIES was always my least favorite. Again, I didn't dislike it. It has its moments, but it was their weakest album to me. This held true until the release of DIRTY WORK. I know I'm not alone in my opinion that this is the weakest album they've ever released. Not a piece of trash like many have argued, just nothing better than fair, IMHO.

There are many Stones' albums that make my list of "good" Stones' albums. This "second level" list includes most of the early ones up through BETWEEN THE BUTTONS, as well as more recent albums like UNDERCOVER, EMOTIONAL RESCUE, and BRIDGES TO BABYLON. All of these are good, solid Stones' albums. They are the equivalent of most artists' masterpieces, IMHO. Better than 90% of anything by anyone else. Most of them had potential to be even better, but suffered from weaker production, unfinished, underdeveloped songs or too much production--as in the case of UNDERCOVER and BRIDGES. As for BRIDGES, it seemed much weaker to me at the time of its release than it does now. Coming after the great and near masterpiece VOODOO LOUNGE, it was a letdown. Still a good, solid album that was better than we really had a right to expect and certainly much better than 99% of the music of the time including the music made by the Stones' peers. A similiar thing happened with GOATS HEAD SOUP in '73. A good album that seemed like such a letdown after the string of wonderful albums that preceded it.

The third level is the great Stones' albums. These are the albums that are second only to the masterpieces. They all are excellent albums, but fall just a little short with not quite enough truly great, all-time classic songs ala "Brown Sugar" or "Gimmie Shelter." Albums in this category would be TATTOO YOU, VOODOO LOUNGE, and EXILE. I know most fans will disagree with me about EXILE, but that's the way I see it.

Finally, you have the masterpieces. The fourth and final level of all-time classics. The big three for me--LET IT BLEED, STICKY FINGERS, and SOME GIRLS. I don't need to say much else about them.

I've never understood how anyone could completely dislike ANY Stones' album. I guess I never will..


Follow Ups:


[ Message board ] [ FAQ ]