IT'S A GAS, GAS, GAS!!

MESSAGE BOARD ARCHIVES/WEEKLY ROCK POLL POST

Return to Gasx3/Poll Post Board Homepage


Gasland Message

Name: Keno
E-Mail:
Subject: RE: paper work to back some of this up?????
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2015
Time: 1:02:27 AM
Remote Address: 162.255.158.4
Message ID: 296416
Parent ID: 296412
Thread ID: 296390

RE: paper work to back some of this up?????

Just how many times does somebody have to re-write their book before they get it right and stop making up stories that are proven false? Why wasn't this all corrected in the '05 release? Why a need to, in '13, write it again? When the new added chapter written in '13 is proven false, will yet another rewrite be made a few years later with yet another story?

As far as the five most provable new facts, 3 of those, 2 thru 4, are all very old news, and nothing new at all. Keith wasn't there that day or night, and it can be proven he wasn't there, so how could what he says about who killed Brian be proven true? It can't! Plus, the book now claims he was there with Mick on that day, and that he was in on it? If so, why would he claim that he feels Brian was murdered? If you had a hand in killing somebody and got away with it thanks to the police claiming the person wasn't murdered, why would you then say that he was murdered? You would go along with the phony police report instead. Keith simply believed a false story about the party which never took place.... Plus number 3 was told years ago, and for number 2, everybody and their dog knew years ago about the police planning at first to arrest Frank for murder, that's the oldest news out there.

As far as Janet goes, she only spoke to one person about her story, a newspaper reporter in '08, that was it, she was long dead before '13 and didn't talk to anybody else about this, as she was very sick and dying. Anybody who claims she spoke to them is full of it. When did she do this and why did it take so many years for it to be published? Are you gonna believe that she comes clean in '08, months before she dies, and then after that, weeks before her death, makes up a totally new, different story that she was with Tom instead that night, and nobody knows of this interview until '13?

Who is this Paul Spendell anyway and why should we now believe him? This book is still full of it, Terry can keep rewriting it over and over again, but why believe somebody who was proven to have made up stories in the past in this same book?

Gasland Thread

Post Follow-up

Name:

Password:      Check this box to save password.

E-Mail:

Subject:

Message:



Note: Do not hit the "Post Message" button more than once, even if it is taking a long time to post your message. Doing so may cause a double post to appear and could slow down your posting time even more.


Filter Threads/Archives

Year:
Month:
Text Search:



Download your free, customizable Burton Networks Message Board now!

© 1998 - 2022 by Keno Internet Services, except where otherwise noted. All rights reserved.

Return to Gasx3/Poll Post Board